thanks for responding. Regarding your final point, that I was happy with the operation until I
found out what it was called - this is not the case. When I first saw the results of what I
thought was a circumcision I was mortified. I went to my GP & was told that this was perfectly
normal, & I went back a few months later & was told the same thing, ie all is well. At no
point, before the operation or afterwards, was I informed that I had received something called
a dorsal slit. I have my medical records & every single document, including the consent form, says
circumcision.
I specifically asked for a circumcision - & this is recorded in the files - and of course I didn't
say 'Oh, by the way, don't perform a dorsal slit' because I would have had no idea what this was,
and even after I'd actually had a dorsal slit I still didn't know what it was because not one of
the medical people I had any contact with, before and after the operation, said anything about
something called a dorsal slit.
There was nothing open-ended or ambiguous about the consent. It couldn't be more specific - I signed a form consenting to a circumcision, not a form that said ' Do whatever it takes to cure a condition called phimosis' .
You said 'A dorsal slit though initially odd, as you have a loose foreskin, will gradually remodel', This is absolutely not the case with me. it looks as grim as it did when I first saw it on the day of the operation,