With you being only at beginning of your journey, I’ll explain my theory about why I think Sjögren’s is so hard for doctors to diagnose compared to RA. I believe this is due to great ignorance in medical circles (particularly in UK) about the huge range of ways it can manifest.
So almost everything you will read about SS will be very skewed towards the dry eyes and mouth, glandular seropositive presentation, because these are the ones who are relatively easy to diagnose with positive Ro and La antibodies. And these are the only people who get to take part in clinical trials.
But Sjögren’s isn't called a Syndrome for nothing and, similarly to Lupus and Vasculitis, there are literally hundreds of presentations.
So you do need to be very discerning about what you read and quote because Arthritis Research UK only gets its information from doctors and clinical trials focussed on Ro positive sufferers.
So my version of active disease is not necessarily referring to severe ocular or oral dryness - although these are an ongoing issue for me of course. But then I’m lip biopsy positive with +ANA and this is what is meant by seronegative - so the tendency for people like me is to present with RA and MS-like version of Sjögren’s.
And when I speak of my disease being active, I mean the RA/MS like symptoms not just the Sicca. When Arthritis Research UK speaks of active disease they mean ocular and oral dryness and Fibromyalgia type pain and fatigue plus swollen glands. They don’t mean neuropathy or secondary RA/ tendinitis or gastric problems or organ involvement that many of us suffer from as part of our version of Sjögren’s.
Also CRP of 21 (we each have to get to know our blood trends as they are unique to us) is actually quite high for most RA sufferers. Mine was 160 when I had pancreatitis and later on, sepsis. But for non infectious/ acute times it is usually 12-14 or lower so for me, so this is high. Most people with RA would be the same as me actually but, unlike me, they would also have swollen, very painful synovial joints which by now would have eroded. This is why it’s easy to diagnose and usually requires treating early on before damage occurs. And for most it fluctuates according to disease activity - if it stays high it means that the treatment isn’t working.
Sjögren’s is a very different disease and sadly, for those like me with the MS variety - a lot of damage occurs to the small nerve fibres - meaning that we can turn permanently numb. And absolutely nothing is done to prevent this so far - probably because we aren’t included on clinical trials.
So the info given out about the CRP and ESR not being relevemant to active disease is a potentially harmful misinformation for us. And I state this as a fact because it’s affected me and others I know who are mostly seronegative. In the US is have been offered IViG but the UK is lagging terribly behind with Sjögren’s.