i know how you feel, mixed advice,, we need some true answers
I have been diagnosed with svt... Doctors are recommending an ablation.... They have not given me any details of which side the fault is on.... But like with most people suffering from this condition the anxiety that comes with diagnosis is extremely high... I have been to several cardiologists who all gave me different answers...I also except that they have different degrees of knowledge... My concerns are that one cardiologist says an svt episode of 247 BPM is too high and dangerous for your heart to stand.. (mine lasted about 45-60 minutes).. Where as another says I can go on life living normally and to ignore episodes and not to worry... Easily said then done, but their we go.... If the latter is true why are people with svts being rushed to hospital and their heart restarted with the drug adenosine... surely the ambulance team would turn up diagnose svt and tell the patient its not life threatening and to ride it out. Also why are the hospitals offering people with SVT operations with potential complications for a non-life threatening condition... I have been quoted so many times the success rate of ablations at the hospital .. But what they do not say is or they do not know, when you have your operation and walk out of the hospital complications can occur several weeks or months after the ablation.. This data would not be recorded.. E.g if I have a heart attack/stroke/blood clot 2 months after the ablation this would be recorded as cause of death as a heart attack/stroke/blood clot and not a complication from surgery.
I was considering the ablation at first as SVTs do effect your daily life not just because of the uncomfortableness of them but mainly the fear of damage to the heart or the possibility of dying, but now I'm not sure. Cardiologists state that SVTs are benign and non life threatening, if this is the case why offer people operations that could possibly have such serious outcomes.... say 1 in 400 suffer a stroke etc etc.. to me thats still quite high.. Many sufferers on the internet post their own stories of successes and not so successful operations begs to differ the true statistics...Too many seem to get reoccurrence of SVT after an ablation and even worse go from SVT to AF.
Statements online say ‘ in most cases SVTs are not life threatening’… I want to emphasise on the words ‘most cases’ as this does not mean all cases. This little grey area is the reason why sufferers are anxious and possibly the reason why we end up in A & E or emergency departments with our SVT episodes. If we didn't have this ‘what if its life threatening’ hanging over our heads i am sure most sufferers anxieties having another
SVT would also dissipate which would improve their lives dramatically, more so than having an ablation procedure.…
What I would really like answer to is
If I had an SVT of e.g 300BPM and stayed at home without intervention for hours/days and no matter how uncomfortable or symptomatic, would it kill me or damage my heart?And that all the symptoms from an SVT e.g tight chested, breathlessness, etc would disappear.
If the answer is yes… then the statements that it is not life threatening is false but would encourage me to have an ablation.
If the answer is no, then I possibly wouldn't put my health at risk with an operation thats not complication free. Also the anxiety of having another SVT would mostly disappear due to the confirmation that it will cause no harm whatsovever to my heart which would be the reason for having the ablation in the first place.. If I chose to have an ablation knowing that the SVTs are not life threatening or damaging my heart, and just for the reason that its effecting my life due to anxiety and worry, surely then just the confirmation of the above
would resolve this issue then their would be no need for an ablation. Of course in some peoples cases they would have the ablation as they have SVTs too frequently.
Even if a persons SVT was around the 160 BPM this doesn't mean that their next wont be much higher. And if the cardiologist says that this rate is not life threatening and not to worry about it and go home, maybe the next time this person is sitting at home with an SVT of 250 BPM or more, they would stay at home as the cardiologist advised and this potentially could be dangerous. So we have to look at the worst case scenario for all sufferers and get the information out their as to relieve peoples worries and stress