Hi.
in general, SVT is not life threatening and there are four options. Option 1 is to do nothing. Option two is a pill in pocket approach where you take a pill only during an attack. Option three is to take daily medications. Option 4 is ablation. Going back to option 1, "doing nothing" means medically doing nothing. If relevant, this is a good opportunity to modify your lifestyle which may include losing weight, cutting down on stimulants (coffee,drugs, alcohol), managing your blood pressure and going on a regular exercise program. I assume they took a thyroid panel to rule out overactive thyroid? Sleep apnea is often linked to arrhythmias, so a sleep study would not be out of the question.
I also have been having SVT epiodes for the past six weeks at the rate of 3 per week. Fortunately, they last under 10 minutes and they convert back by themselves without drugs in under ten minutes so I have not had to go to the ER. I am still with Option 1 (doing nothing) but am experimenting with diet and exercise. If things don't get better soon I will speak to my EP about meds and/or ablation.
In your case, you've only had two attacks in seven months, so doing nothing is a very reasonable option. Have they taught you how to do the valsalva maneuver or the modified valsalva maneuver at home? This or other techniques could conceivably save you a trip to the ER. Or maybe they tried these manuevers at the hospital before adminstering Adosonine? If not, they should have. Did they have you blow hard into something and then possibly elevate your feet?
In the end, it's a very individual decision regarding ablation. The good news is that SVT ablation is a shorter and safer procedure than afib ablation and the success rates are very high around 90% I believe. But it's still an ablation with general anathesia and all which is my understanding.
The other thing is that my understanding is that SVT, while it can happen at any age, is more common with young women and that they can outgrow this condition when they get older. Has your doctor brought this up?
No easy answers, but a second (or third) opinion from both an EP (and cardiologist) might be reasonable. Just be aware that EPs tend to favor ablation because that is what they do. Doesn't make it the wrong choice, but doesn't make it the right one either.
I asked my cardiologist when does he recommend ablation and his answer was when the patient asks for it. What he meant was that ablation in most cases is more of a lifestyle decision than a medical one because the other options are all valid.
The phrase "breaking point" is sometimes used with SVT and ablation. And that's when you just get so fed up with the episodes and/or medical treatment, that you say, "enough' and do an ablation. With my frequent episodes, I'm getting near that breaking point but it doesn't seem you are.
No right or wrong decision but if unsure, take your time to think this through and get more opinions and don't feel don't be pressured by your two week deadline. You can always reschedule if need be.
Jim